The Kung

1         Ernestine Friedls assertion that wo manpowers position in rules of order is higher(prenominal) the more(prenominal) they ar involved with first subsistence and distri scarceion holds true for women in the Kung society. Shotak writes, kung women ar recognized by men and women alike as the primary economic providers of the group. They derive vegetable foods from the wild at least three days a week providing the majority of the routine diet of their families and other dependants. (Shoztak,pg 240) The fact that women in Kung society are heavily involved with primary subsistence affords them great personnel and liberty within the group structure of the Kung. Kung men dumbfound slender control or influence over the womens conclave practices. Shoztak goes on to write that, This economic activity is an autonomous undertaking. work major power do non regulate womens schedules, do not insure them which foods to gather or where to go¦(Shoztak, pg 241) The Kung women are considered experts at what they do, and the men imbibe little overcompensate to interfere with that which they do not know. In this case, you cannot send a man to do a hypothecate that a woman knows best. Kung women attain such paper notecase not only because they are in charge of the gathering, merely more so because they are in charge of distribution.

A Kung woman does not return to the village and turn over the fruits of her labor to the man in the family. The women are in the right position of allocating that which she has worked for. In addressing this, Shoztak writes, When a women returns to the village, she determines how much of her gath! erings will be given away and to whom. (Shoztak, pg 242) In some ways, this makes Kung women the givers of life and survival. A Kung woman can ensure the... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay